News | Published June 29 2020

Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee report derides Gambling Commission activity

A parliamentary report has stated that the Gambling Commission and the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport have an "unacceptably weak understanding" of how gambling can harm people.

The Public Accounts Committee described the regulator as "toothless" and highlighted its lack of measurable targets for problem gamblers. It also described the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport as "complacent".

Despite complaints, the Commission stated that it had been upgrading player protection measures.

It, did, however, say: "We accepted before the Committee that there is always more to do and we are carefully considering the findings of their report to see what other additional steps we can take."

The report also criticised the body's attitude towards problem gambling.

"The government has approached other public health issues on the basis that prevention is better than cure," the report said. The Public Accounts Committee's role is to scrutinise the value for money of government projects.

"However, the department was unwilling to accept the premise that increasing the commission's budget to prevent harm would be preferable to spending on treating problem gamblers."

Despite the fact that licence fees generate some £19 million for the Gambling Commission every year, the sector turns over more than £11 billion a year, spending an annual fee of around £60 million to treat problem gamblers.

The PAC report stated that there are about 395,000 problem gamblers who "bet compulsively" in the country. Apparently, as many as 1.8 million more are "at risk" of addiction.

"The effects can be devastating, life-changing for people and whole families, including financial and home loss, relationship breakdowns, criminality and suicide.

Meg Hillier MP, who chairs the committee, called for reform.

"What has emerged in evidence is a picture of a torpid, toothless regulator that doesn't seem terribly interested in either the harms it exists to reduce or the means it might use to achieve that."

"The commission needs a radical overhaul: it must be quicker at responding to problems, update company licence conditions to protect vulnerable consumers and beef up those consumers' rights to redress when it fails."

Related Stories

Authored by

The Parliamentary Review

June 29 2020

Featured Organisations

WhiffAway Group

Conscious of the environmental crisis, WhiffAway Group Directors James McLean and Sebastian Marshall set out to provide technology which would reduce ... Read more

Cranborne Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Cranborne Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty stretches back over several millennia. Home to an impressive Neolithic monument as well as the 14th... Read more

Warren & Co

Based in Gloucester, Warren & Co is a firm providing free mortgage advice and complete financial solutions with guidance in the domains of investment,... Read more

Latest News

Sharma pleased with Brazil climate mission

New UKGI Chair appointed