Nexus Independent Financial Advisers

A Message from Lord Pickles and Lord Blunkett, followed by Nexus Independent Financial Advisers's best practice article

The ability to listen and learn from one another has always been vital in parliament, in business and in most aspects of daily life. But at this particular moment in time, as national and global events continue to reiterate, it is uncommonly crucial that we forge new channels of communication and reinforce existing ones. The following article from Nexus Independent Financial Advisers is an attempt to do just that. We would welcome your thoughts on this or any other Parliamentary Review article.

Blunkett signature Rt Hon The Lord David Blunkett
Pickles signature Rt Hon The Lord Eric Pickles

Highlighting best practice
Kerry Nelson, Owner and
Managing Director
Nexus Independent Financial Advisers is committed to providing
its clients with expert financial advice over the long term
as their life evolves and their financial priorities change.
Itaims to demystify the financial services industry, assisting clients by
interpreting jargon and putting complicated regulation into a language
anyone can understand. Owner and Managing Director Kerry Nelson
has more than 29 years’ experience in financial services and tells
how regulation is affecting the sector.
Nexus is a Hampshire-based firm of IFAs, striving to build and maintain fair, honest
and genuine relationships with our clients while delivering the most effective and
appropriate financial solutions for their needs. We offer a complete range of financial
solutions, tailored to meet the demands and objectives of a broad range of clients.
Our clients include low to middle-income earners, highly affluent individuals, families,
partnerships and SMEs. We boast a wealth of industry experience, with our staff and
advisers having worked with some of the biggest names in financial services.
The regulatory environment
As an owner of a financial advice business, I worry that perceptions about the sector
have coloured the views of policymakers andas a result the public, and in particular
the investing and saving public, have lost out. MPs of all parties have without doubt
been exasperated by financial advice scandals and, at times, a perceived reluctance of
advisers to embrace new government initiatives.
Advisers have resented being viewed as always part of the problem, especially when
they feel their knowledge and experience could help refine and improve policy and
even avoid some of those scandals. In between, there is a huge amount of regulatory
architecture that includes the Financial Conduct Authority,the Financial Ombudsman
Serviceand the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, who are arguably the most
influential forces behind financial regulation in the UK.
The full version of statutory regulation came in under former chancellor Gordon
Brown and was then reorganised by his successor George Osborne in the wake of the
financial crisis. Regulations now shape a great deal of any financial advice business.
The biggest intervention has been the Retail Distribution Review (RDR),which banned
commission payments from pension providers and fund managers from 2013,
ushering in a huge shift in how advisers charged clients.
What might surprise some policymakers is that advisers who embraced the RDR and
adapted to it swiftly are satisfied with the new environment. It ensured that advisers
were properly aligned with the interests of their clients and significantly reduced the
temptation for advisers to make quick one-off sales in order to receive payment from
an insurance company, thus removing a big cause of instability in advisers’ models as
insurers could often claw back that commission if someone stopped theirpayments.
In fact, most advisers are glad that the regulator carries a deterrent. While we do
everything in our power to avoid complaints to theFOS,we understand fully that
»Owner and Managing
Director: Kerry Nelson
»Founded in 2008
»Based in Fareham, Hampshire
»Services: IFA striving to build
and maintain fair, honest and
genuine relationships with our
clients while delivering the
most effective and appropriate
financial solutions for their
»No. of employees: 20
Nexus Independent
Financial Advisers
having recourse to FOS is better than
unhappy clients seeking redress in
the courts. Finally, we accept that the
Financial Services Compensation Scheme
gives consumers confidence in investing
without the worryofa companyfolding.
Policy requirements
There remain several areas where many
advisers feel things are not working
as well as they might and could be
improved significantly for investors and
savers. For example, we have assisted
the mother of one of our clients in
securing compensation from a property
investment that went wrong. There
were a host of problems related to this
transaction. Among other things, this kind
of investment – an unregulated, collective
investment scheme – should never have
been recommended in the first place.
She followed a conventional financial
services route – talking to an adviser and
placing her money into a self-invested
personal pension. The adviser has since
disappeared from the industry. The
property company kept making calls for
more money, despite her being long
retired and just wanting a stable income.
Such a situation throws up several
issues. First, the ombudsman route was
not available because the adviser had
gone bankrupt and it requires legal
action against the property company –
now under consideration. Second, we
sought compensation from the FSCS.
Ironically, thatmay increase our cost
of doing business, because all advisers
pay into the pool of money from which
compensation is drawn.
It is always rather exasperating when
what is very expensive regulation, after
all the reforms, fails to stop this sort of
adviser from operating. We cannot see
why the conventional, regulated part of
financial services is still somehow putting
people into these sorts of investments. So,
while no regulation is airtight, we think
it should be easier to keep mainstream
clients away from this sort of investment.
The adviser should not have been in
business and in an ideal world would be
barred. The SIPP company should have
known the investor was a mainstream
conventional person moving into
retirement and not a sophisticated
property investor. Therefore, we
would ask policymakers to consider
whether the boundary between most
advised clients and the sophisticated
few who might venture some money
in property developments and other
high-risk investments is adequate and
Our second appeal would be that
policymakers consider at what stage
they involve advisers.
We have two examples where we think
advisers could have helped. Firstly, while
advisers largely welcomed pension
freedom reform on behalf of our clients,
we did have misgivings about the speed
of their introduction. The FCA is still
playing catch-up and, with more thought,
it should have been possible to anticipate
the problems with pension transfers from
occupational schemes. Effective input
from some of the better pension advisers
could have helped avoid these problems.
The second example concerns the
government’s aim of spreading the
investing, saving and pension habit.
The RDR reforms, while necessary, did
widen the savings and investing gap –
lower earning people don’t generally get
access to advice. The initiative intended
to address this; the Financial Advice
Market Reviewput a lot of its eggs
in the automated advice basket. Yet,
recently, the FCA has started to suggest
that a lot of so-called robo-advice may
not meet their suitability requirements.
The FAMR would have been more
successful had consideration been given
to how to build efficiencies into the
existing regulated advice channel, perhaps
with partial automation to narrow the
gap. It is certainly something we would
have been interested in embracing as a
firm. Our view is that many advisers are
not against the right sort of regulation.
We would love to help drive out more
bad behaviour, but with a little more
conversation and consultation, we think
advisers could help governments deliver
their policy goals as well.
More needs to be done
to protect people from
putting saving into
complicated, esoteric and
unregulated investments
Our view is that
many advisers
are not against
the right sort of
regulation. We
would love to
help drive out
more bad
behaviour, but
with a little more
conversation and
consultation, we
think advisers
could help
deliver their
policy goals as

This article was sponsored by Nexus Independent Financial Advisers. The Parliamentary Review is wholly funded by the representatives who write for it. The publication in which this article originally appeared contained the following foreword from The Rt Hon Theresa May MP.

The Rt Hon Theresa May MP's Foreword For The Parliamentary Review

By The Rt Hon Theresa May MP

This foreword from the then Prime Minister appeared in the 2018/19 Parliamentary Review.

British politics provides ample material for analysis in the pages of The Parliamentary Review. For Her Majesty’s Government, our task in the year ahead is clear: to achieve the best Brexit deal for Britain and to carry on our work to build a more prosperous and united country – one that truly works for everyone. 

The right Brexit deal will not be sufficient on its own to secure a more prosperous future for Britain. We also need to ensure that our economy is ready for what tomorrow will bring. Our Modern Industrial Strategy is our plan to do that. It means Government stepping up to secure the foundations of our productivity: providing an education system that delivers the skills our economy needs, improving school standards and transforming technical education; delivering infrastructure for growth; ensuring people have the homes they need in the places they want to live. It is all about taking action for the long-term that will pay dividends in the future.

But it also goes beyond that. Government, the private sector and academia working together as strategic partners achieve far more than we could separately. That is why we have set an ambitious goal of lifting UK public and private research and development investment to 2.4 per cent of GDP by 2027. It is why we are developing four Grand Challenges, the big drivers of social and economic change in the world today: harnessing artificial intelligence and the data revolution; leading in changes to the future of mobility; meeting the challenges of our ageing society; and driving ahead the revolution in clean growth. By focusing our efforts on making the most of these areas of enormous potential, we can develop new exports, grow new industries and create more good jobs in every part of our country.

Years of hard work and sacrifice from the British people have got our deficit down by over three quarters. We are building on this success by taking a balanced approach to public spending. We are continuing to deal with our debts, so that our economy can remain strong and we can protect people’s jobs, and at the same time we are investing in vital public services, like our NHS. We have set out plans to increase NHS funding annually by an average by 3.4 percent in real terms: that is £394 million a week more. In return, the NHS will produce a ten-year plan, led by doctors and nurses, to eliminate waste and improve patient care.

I believe that Britain can look to the future with confidence. We are leaving the EU and setting a new course for prosperity as a global trading nation. We have a Modern Industrial Strategy that is strengthening the foundations of our economy and helping us to seize the opportunities of the future. We are investing in the public services we all rely on and helping them to grow and improve. Building on our country’s great strengths – our world-class universities and researchers, our excellent services sector, our cutting edge manufacturers, our vibrant creative industries, our dedicated public servants – we can look towards a new decade that is ripe with possibility. The government I lead is doing all it can to make that brighter future a reality for everyone in our country. 

British politics provides ample material for analysis in the pages of The Parliamentary Review 
The Rt Hon Theresa May MP
Prime Minister